2-axis random candidate/voter positions
ballots computed by distance between voter and candidate
title: KR2 Test Suite 0001 (50 ballots)
| choice |
avg choice rank |
Core |
STV |
Schulze |
RankedPairs |
KR2 |
Copeland |
| BORING |
2.06000 (103/50) |
1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 (5) |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94000 (147/50) |
2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 (3) |
| FACTIOUS |
3.20000 (160/50) |
3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 (1) |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16000 (208/50) |
4 |
5 / 5 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 (-2) |
| EVIL |
4.28000 (214/50) |
5 |
6 / 6 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
4 (-2) |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36000 (218/50) |
6 |
4 / 4 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 (-5) |
Voting results shown with/without ACR tie-breaking.
Results for Core method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
2/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
4/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
5/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
6/placed |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| BORING |
2.06 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94 |
| FACTIOUS |
3.2 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16 |
| EVIL |
4.28 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36 |
Results for STV method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
2/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/eliminated |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
4/eliminated |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
5/eliminated |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
6/eliminated |
| Round # |
Quota |
BORING |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
FACTIOUS |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
| 1 |
25 |
19 |
8 |
10 |
5 |
4 |
4 ❌ |
| 2 |
25 |
19 |
11 |
11 |
5 |
4 ❌ |
❌ |
| 3 |
25 |
20 |
11 |
14 |
5 ❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 4 |
25 |
21 |
15 |
14 ❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 5 |
25 |
35 ✅ |
15 |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 6 |
12.5 |
✅ |
25 ✅ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| BORING |
2.06 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94 |
| FACTIOUS |
3.2 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16 |
| EVIL |
4.28 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36 |
Results for Schulze method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
2/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
4/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
5/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Schulze algorithm.
|
BORING |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
FACTIOUS |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
CHAOTIC |
| BORING |
🛇 |
20 ✅ |
22 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-20 ❌ |
🛇 |
4 ✅ |
14 ✅ |
26 ✅ |
32 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
-22 ❌ |
-4 ❌ |
🛇 |
24 ✅ |
20 ✅ |
12 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
-34 ❌ |
-14 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
6 ✅ |
| EVIL |
-34 ❌ |
-26 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
2 ✅ |
| CHAOTIC |
-34 ❌ |
-32 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
-6 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| BORING |
2.06 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94 |
| FACTIOUS |
3.2 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16 |
| EVIL |
4.28 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36 |
Results for RankedPairs method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
2/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
4/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
5/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Ranked Pairs algorithm.
|
BORING |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
FACTIOUS |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
CHAOTIC |
| BORING |
🛇 |
20 ✅🔒 |
22 ✅🔒 |
34 ✅🔒 |
34 ✅🔒 |
34 ✅🔒 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-20 ❌ |
🛇 |
4 ✅🔒 |
14 ✅🔒 |
26 ✅🔒 |
32 ✅🔒 |
| FACTIOUS |
-22 ❌ |
-4 ❌ |
🛇 |
24 ✅🔒 |
20 ✅🔒 |
12 ✅🔒 |
| ABNORMAL |
-34 ❌ |
-14 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
6 ✅🔒 |
| EVIL |
-34 ❌ |
-26 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
2 ✅🔒 |
| CHAOTIC |
-34 ❌ |
-32 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
-6 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| BORING |
2.06 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94 |
| FACTIOUS |
3.2 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16 |
| EVIL |
4.28 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36 |
Results for KR2 method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
2/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
4/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
5/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Kluft algorithm.
|
wins-loss |
BORING |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
FACTIOUS |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
CHAOTIC |
| BORING |
5 |
🛇 |
20 ✅ |
22 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
34 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
3 |
-20 ❌ |
🛇 |
4 ✅ |
14 ✅ |
26 ✅ |
32 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
1 |
-22 ❌ |
-4 ❌ |
🛇 |
24 ✅ |
20 ✅ |
12 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
-2 |
-34 ❌ |
-14 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
6 ✅ |
| EVIL |
-2 |
-34 ❌ |
-26 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
2 ✅ |
| CHAOTIC |
-5 |
-34 ❌ |
-32 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
-6 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| BORING |
2.06 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
2.94 |
| FACTIOUS |
3.2 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.16 |
| EVIL |
4.28 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.36 |