title: KR2 Test Suite 0001 (50 ballots)
choice avg choice rank Core KR2 Copeland BORING 2.06000 (103/50) 1 1 / 1 1 (8) DYSFUNCTIONAL 2.94000 (147/50) 2 2 / 2 2 (4) FACTIOUS 3.20000 (160/50) 3 3 / 3 3 (2) ABNORMAL 4.16000 (208/50) 4 4 / 4 4 (-3) EVIL 4.28000 (214/50) 5 5 / 5 4 (-3) CHAOTIC 4.36000 (218/50) 6 6 / 6 6 (-6) Voting results shown with/without ACR tie-breaking.
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result BORING tedious boring 1/selected DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 2/placed FACTIOUS factious divisive 3/placed ABNORMAL abnormal antisocial 4/placed EVIL evil villain 5/placed CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 6/placed Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.
Candidate average ranking BORING 2.06 DYSFUNCTIONAL 2.94 FACTIOUS 3.2 ABNORMAL 4.16 EVIL 4.28 CHAOTIC 4.36
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0001
1 seat available ● 50 ballots processed
Abbreviation Name/description Result BORING tedious boring 1/selected _support2 [rating bound _support2] - DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 2/placed FACTIOUS factious divisive 3/placed _neutral [rating bound _neutral] - ABNORMAL abnormal antisocial 4/eliminated EVIL evil villain 5/eliminated CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 6/eliminated _oppose2 [rating bound _oppose2] - Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Kluft algorithm.
wins-loss BORING _support2 DYSFUNCTIONAL FACTIOUS _neutral ABNORMAL EVIL CHAOTIC _oppose2 BORING 8 🛇 16 ✅ 20 ✅ 22 ✅ 42 ✅ 34 ✅ 34 ✅ 34 ✅ 50 ✅ _support2 6 -16 ❌ 🛇 12 ✅ 18 ✅ 50 ✅ 30 ✅ 36 ✅ 32 ✅ 50 ✅ DYSFUNCTIONAL 4 -20 ❌ -12 ❌ 🛇 4 ✅ 22 ✅ 14 ✅ 26 ✅ 32 ✅ 44 ✅ FACTIOUS 2 -22 ❌ -18 ❌ -4 ❌ 🛇 20 ✅ 24 ✅ 20 ✅ 12 ✅ 38 ✅ _neutral 0 -42 ❌ -50 ❌ -22 ❌ -20 ❌ 🛇 2 ✅ 4 ✅ 8 ✅ 50 ✅ ABNORMAL -3 -34 ❌ -30 ❌ -14 ❌ -24 ❌ -2 ❌ 🛇 0 🔵 6 ✅ 32 ✅ EVIL -3 -34 ❌ -36 ❌ -26 ❌ -20 ❌ -4 ❌ 0 🔵 🛇 2 ✅ 20 ✅ CHAOTIC -6 -34 ❌ -32 ❌ -32 ❌ -12 ❌ -8 ❌ -6 ❌ -2 ❌ 🛇 18 ✅ _oppose2 -8 -50 ❌ -50 ❌ -44 ❌ -38 ❌ -50 ❌ -32 ❌ -20 ❌ -18 ❌ 🛇 Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
Candidate average ranking BORING 2.48 _support2 2.88 DYSFUNCTIONAL 3.9 FACTIOUS 4.3 ABNORMAL 5.66 _neutral 5.7 EVIL 5.98 CHAOTIC 6.08 _oppose2 8.02