2-axis random candidate/voter positions
ballots computed by distance between voter and candidate
title: KR2 Test Suite 0002 (100 ballots)
| choice |
avg choice rank |
Core |
STV |
Schulze |
RankedPairs |
KR2 |
Copeland |
| EVIL |
2.10000 (210/100) |
1 |
2 / 2 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 (4) |
| BORING |
2.38000 (238/100) |
2 |
1 / 1 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
1 (4) |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75000 (275/100) |
3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 (1) |
| CHAOTIC |
4.30000 (430/100) |
4 |
6 / 6 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 (-1) |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.70000 (470/100) |
5 |
4 / 4 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 (-5) |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77000 (477/100) |
6 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 (-3) |
Voting results shown with/without ACR tie-breaking.
Results for Core method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002
2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
1/selected |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
2/selected |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
4/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
5/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
6/placed |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| EVIL |
2.1 |
| BORING |
2.38 |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.3 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.7 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77 |
Results for STV method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002
2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
1/selected |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
2/selected |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
4/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
5/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
6/placed |
| Round # |
Quota |
BORING |
EVIL |
FACTIOUS |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
ABNORMAL |
CHAOTIC |
| 1 |
33.33333 |
44 ✅ |
36 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
| 2 |
22.22222 |
✅ |
42.78788 ✅ |
8.48485 |
7.39394 |
7 |
1 |
| 3 |
13.4797 |
✅ |
✅ |
24.46256 ✅ |
7.97654 |
7 |
1 |
| 4 |
7.625 |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
8.76123 ✅ |
7.42693 |
6.68683 |
| 5 |
4.81518 |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
7.60267 ✅ |
6.84287 |
| 6 |
2.86519 |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
✅ |
8.59556 ✅ |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| EVIL |
2.1 |
| BORING |
2.38 |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.3 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.7 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77 |
Results for Schulze method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002
2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
1/selected |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
2/selected |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
4/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Schulze algorithm.
|
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| EVIL |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
58 ✅ |
82 ✅ |
76 ✅ |
64 ✅ |
| BORING |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
18 ✅ |
50 ✅ |
64 ✅ |
92 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
-58 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
🛇 |
92 ✅ |
80 ✅ |
54 ✅ |
| CHAOTIC |
-82 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
🛇 |
44 ✅ |
20 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
-76 ❌ |
-64 ❌ |
-80 ❌ |
-44 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-64 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
-54 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| EVIL |
2.1 |
| BORING |
2.38 |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.3 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.7 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77 |
Results for RankedPairs method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002
2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
1/selected |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
2/selected |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
4/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Ranked Pairs algorithm.
|
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| EVIL |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
58 ✅🔒 |
82 ✅🔒 |
76 ✅🔒 |
64 ✅🔒 |
| BORING |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
18 ✅🔒 |
50 ✅🔒 |
64 ✅🔒 |
92 ✅🔒 |
| FACTIOUS |
-58 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
🛇 |
92 ✅🔒 |
80 ✅🔒 |
54 ✅🔒 |
| CHAOTIC |
-82 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
🛇 |
44 ✅🔒 |
20 ✅🔒 |
| ABNORMAL |
-76 ❌ |
-64 ❌ |
-80 ❌ |
-44 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅🔒 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-64 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
-54 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| EVIL |
2.1 |
| BORING |
2.38 |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.3 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.7 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77 |
Results for KR2 method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002
2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
1/selected |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
2/selected |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
3/placed |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
4/placed |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Kluft algorithm.
|
wins-loss |
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| EVIL |
4 |
🛇 |
0 🔵 |
58 ✅ |
82 ✅ |
76 ✅ |
64 ✅ |
| BORING |
4 |
0 🔵 |
🛇 |
18 ✅ |
50 ✅ |
64 ✅ |
92 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
1 |
-58 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
🛇 |
92 ✅ |
80 ✅ |
54 ✅ |
| CHAOTIC |
-1 |
-82 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
🛇 |
44 ✅ |
20 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
-3 |
-76 ❌ |
-64 ❌ |
-80 ❌ |
-44 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-5 |
-64 ❌ |
-92 ❌ |
-54 ❌ |
-20 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| EVIL |
2.1 |
| BORING |
2.38 |
| FACTIOUS |
2.75 |
| CHAOTIC |
4.3 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
4.7 |
| ABNORMAL |
4.77 |