prefvote

Black-box test data overview for 0002_kr2_level5-test.yaml

2-axis random candidate/voter positions
ballots computed by distance between voter and candidate
title: KR2 Test Suite 0002 (100 ballots)
choice avg choice rank Core KR2 Copeland
EVIL 2.10000 (210/100) 1 1 / 1 1 (8)
BORING 2.38000 (238/100) 2 2 / 2 1 (8)
FACTIOUS 2.75000 (275/100) 3 3 / 3 3 (4)
CHAOTIC 4.30000 (430/100) 4 4 / 4 4 (-1)
DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.70000 (470/100) 5 6 / 6 6 (-6)
ABNORMAL 4.77000 (477/100) 6 5 / 5 5 (-3)

Voting results shown with/without ACR tie-breaking.

Results for Core method

Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002

2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed

Abbreviation Name/description Result
EVIL evil villain 1/selected
BORING tedious boring 2/selected
FACTIOUS factious divisive 3/placed
CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 4/placed
DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 5/placed
ABNORMAL abnormal antisocial 6/placed

Average ballot ranking positions

Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.

Candidate average ranking
EVIL 2.1
BORING 2.38
FACTIOUS 2.75
CHAOTIC 4.3
DYSFUNCTIONAL 4.7
ABNORMAL 4.77

Results for KR2 method

Results: KR2 Test Suite 0002

2 seats available ● 100 ballots processed

Abbreviation Name/description Result
EVIL evil villain 1/selected
BORING tedious boring 2/selected
_support2 [rating bound _support2] -
FACTIOUS factious divisive 3/placed
_support1 [rating bound _support1] -
CHAOTIC chaotic unpredictable 4/placed
ABNORMAL abnormal antisocial 5/placed
DYSFUNCTIONAL dysfunctional incompetent 6/placed
_oppose1 [rating bound _oppose1] -
_oppose2 [rating bound _oppose2] -

Margin-of-victory matrix

This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Kluft algorithm.

wins-loss EVIL BORING _support2 FACTIOUS _support1 CHAOTIC ABNORMAL DYSFUNCTIONAL _oppose1 _oppose2
EVIL 8 🛇 0 🔵 18 ✅ 58 ✅ 64 ✅ 82 ✅ 76 ✅ 64 ✅ 90 ✅ 100 ✅
BORING 8 0 🔵 🛇 22 ✅ 18 ✅ 64 ✅ 50 ✅ 64 ✅ 92 ✅ 90 ✅ 100 ✅
_support2 4 -18 ❌ -22 ❌ 🛇 0 🔵 100 ✅ 62 ✅ 70 ✅ 74 ✅ 100 ✅ 100 ✅
FACTIOUS 4 -58 ❌ -18 ❌ 0 🔵 🛇 36 ✅ 92 ✅ 80 ✅ 54 ✅ 74 ✅ 96 ✅
_support1 1 -64 ❌ -64 ❌ -100 ❌ -36 ❌ 🛇 10 ✅ 36 ✅ 52 ✅ 100 ✅ 100 ✅
CHAOTIC -1 -82 ❌ -50 ❌ -62 ❌ -92 ❌ -10 ❌ 🛇 44 ✅ 20 ✅ 28 ✅ 56 ✅
ABNORMAL -3 -76 ❌ -64 ❌ -70 ❌ -80 ❌ -36 ❌ -44 ❌ 🛇 10 ✅ 6 ✅ 48 ✅
DYSFUNCTIONAL -6 -64 ❌ -92 ❌ -74 ❌ -54 ❌ -52 ❌ -20 ❌ -10 ❌ 🛇 0 🔵 44 ✅
_oppose1 -6 -90 ❌ -90 ❌ -100 ❌ -74 ❌ -100 ❌ -28 ❌ -6 ❌ 0 🔵 🛇 100 ✅
_oppose2 -9 -100 ❌ -100 ❌ -100 ❌ -96 ❌ -100 ❌ -56 ❌ -48 ❌ -44 ❌ -100 ❌ 🛇

Average ballot ranking positions

Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.

Candidate average ranking
EVIL 2.74
BORING 3
_support2 3.17
FACTIOUS 3.72
_support1 5.33
CHAOTIC 6.24
ABNORMAL 7.03
DYSFUNCTIONAL 7.11
_oppose1 7.44
_oppose2 9.22