2-axis random candidate/voter positions
ballots computed by distance between voter and candidate
title: KR2 Test Suite 0004 (100 ballots)
| choice |
avg choice rank |
Core |
STV |
Schulze |
RankedPairs |
KR2 |
Copeland |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46000 (246/100) |
1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 / 1 |
1 (5) |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62000 (262/100) |
2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 / 2 |
2 (3) |
| BORING |
3.23000 (323/100) |
3 |
3 / 3 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 / 4 |
4 (-1) |
| EVIL |
3.61000 (361/100) |
4 |
5 / 5 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 / 3 |
3 (1) |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08000 (408/100) |
5 |
4 / 4 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 / 5 |
5 (-3) |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5.00000 (500/100) |
6 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 / 6 |
6 (-5) |
Voting results shown with/without ACR tie-breaking.
Results for Core method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0004
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
1/selected |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
2/placed |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
3/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
4/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46 |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62 |
| BORING |
3.23 |
| EVIL |
3.61 |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5 |
Results for STV method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0004
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
1/selected |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
2/placed |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
3/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
4/eliminated |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
5/eliminated |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/eliminated |
| Round # |
Quota |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
EVIL |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| 1 |
50 |
38 |
19 |
20 |
14 |
9 |
0 ❌ |
| 2 |
50 |
38 |
19 |
20 |
14 |
9 ❌ |
❌ |
| 3 |
50 |
41 |
25 |
20 |
14 ❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 4 |
50 |
53 ✅ |
25 |
22 |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 5 |
25 |
✅ |
27.20755 ✅ |
22.79245 |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
| 6 |
12.11728 |
✅ |
✅ |
24.23455 ✅ |
❌ |
❌ |
❌ |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46 |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62 |
| BORING |
3.23 |
| EVIL |
3.61 |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5 |
Results for Schulze method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0004
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
1/selected |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
2/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
3/placed |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
4/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Schulze algorithm.
|
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| CHAOTIC |
🛇 |
16 ✅ |
36 ✅ |
26 ✅ |
72 ✅ |
58 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
-16 ❌ |
🛇 |
56 ✅ |
28 ✅ |
24 ✅ |
84 ✅ |
| EVIL |
-36 ❌ |
-56 ❌ |
🛇 |
2 ✅ |
18 ✅ |
50 ✅ |
| BORING |
-26 ❌ |
-28 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
12 ✅ |
98 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
-72 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-58 ❌ |
-84 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-98 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46 |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62 |
| BORING |
3.23 |
| EVIL |
3.61 |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5 |
Results for RankedPairs method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0004
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
1/selected |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
2/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
3/placed |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
4/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Ranked Pairs algorithm.
|
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| CHAOTIC |
🛇 |
16 ✅🔒 |
36 ✅🔒 |
26 ✅🔒 |
72 ✅🔒 |
58 ✅🔒 |
| ABNORMAL |
-16 ❌ |
🛇 |
56 ✅🔒 |
28 ✅🔒 |
24 ✅🔒 |
84 ✅🔒 |
| EVIL |
-36 ❌ |
-56 ❌ |
🛇 |
2 ✅🔒 |
18 ✅🔒 |
50 ✅🔒 |
| BORING |
-26 ❌ |
-28 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
12 ✅🔒 |
98 ✅🔒 |
| FACTIOUS |
-72 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅🔒 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-58 ❌ |
-84 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-98 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46 |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62 |
| BORING |
3.23 |
| EVIL |
3.61 |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5 |
Results for KR2 method
Results: KR2 Test Suite 0004
1 seat available ● 100 ballots processed
| Abbreviation |
Name/description |
Result |
| CHAOTIC |
chaotic unpredictable |
1/selected |
| ABNORMAL |
abnormal antisocial |
2/placed |
| EVIL |
evil villain |
3/placed |
| BORING |
tedious boring |
4/placed |
| FACTIOUS |
factious divisive |
5/placed |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
dysfunctional incompetent |
6/placed |
Margin-of-victory matrix
This compares how each choice ranks against others, ordered by Kluft algorithm.
|
wins-loss |
CHAOTIC |
ABNORMAL |
EVIL |
BORING |
FACTIOUS |
DYSFUNCTIONAL |
| CHAOTIC |
5 |
🛇 |
16 ✅ |
36 ✅ |
26 ✅ |
72 ✅ |
58 ✅ |
| ABNORMAL |
3 |
-16 ❌ |
🛇 |
56 ✅ |
28 ✅ |
24 ✅ |
84 ✅ |
| EVIL |
1 |
-36 ❌ |
-56 ❌ |
🛇 |
2 ✅ |
18 ✅ |
50 ✅ |
| BORING |
-1 |
-26 ❌ |
-28 ❌ |
-2 ❌ |
🛇 |
12 ✅ |
98 ✅ |
| FACTIOUS |
-3 |
-72 ❌ |
-24 ❌ |
-18 ❌ |
-12 ❌ |
🛇 |
10 ✅ |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
-5 |
-58 ❌ |
-84 ❌ |
-50 ❌ |
-98 ❌ |
-10 ❌ |
🛇 |
Average ballot ranking positions
Lower numbers are favored. First place = 1. Average rank is used to break ties in the primary voting method.
| Candidate |
average ranking |
| CHAOTIC |
2.46 |
| ABNORMAL |
2.62 |
| BORING |
3.23 |
| EVIL |
3.61 |
| FACTIOUS |
4.08 |
| DYSFUNCTIONAL |
5 |